Tuesday, January 31, 2017

 No tear drops from Jewish Schumer for Israel passport holders who are banned from 16 Muslim countries.
 
BMHWashington, D.C 
Thưa Quý Vị, Quý NT và CH..
 
Xin chào cô Nguyễn Ngọc Giao (VVA).
 
Nhớ năm  xưa ( 1975 ) những tên đảng viên đảng Dân Chủ, mặt dày, hèn nhát, phản chiến, vô nhân đạo, thù ghét người Việt Nam...như Jerry BrownJoe Biden, George McGovern, Elizabeth Holtzman, đã từng cố gắng ngăn chặn những Người Việt Quốc Gia Tỵ Nạn cộng sản vào Hoa Kỳ...kể cả những trẻ mồ côi.
 
Nay Tổng Thống Donald Trump hành động " travel ban " để ngăn chặn, phòng ngừa hiểm họa khủng bố thì tên hề rẻ tiền diễu dở Charles ( Chuck ) E. Schumer vội vàng nhỏ vài giọi nước mắt cá sấu, khóc cho những kẽ đang bị tạm giử lại tại sân bay... Và xem hắn từng tuyên bố vào năm 2015...Một tên tráo trở...Thiệt tình...
 
 Cô Nguyễn Ngọc Giao thời gian này (1975) cô ở đâu? Cô có biết những tên Dân Chủ trên và còn nhiều nữa, đã đối xử với người tỵ nạn mình như thế nào không?
 
 Nay cô Nguyễn Ngọc Giao muốn : " ....Voice of Vietnamese Americans Stands with Refugees and Muslim Immigrants in Protecting the American Values".
 
Đó là quyền của cô, nhưng cái tổ chức VVA - hữu danh vô thực - của cô, không có quyền,cũng không có tư cách gì, để lên tiếng nói thay cho tôi, hay thay cho Cộng Đồng Người Việt Quốc Gia Tỵ Nạn cộng sản...đang cư ngụ tại Hoa Kỳ.. 
 
 
 
Xin mời Quý Vị xem bài viết dưới đây để tường....
và tùy nghi thẩm định...
 
BMHWashington, D.C 
 
 

Action- No talk President Trump will not let the enemy know what he is going to do one month/one week/one day ahead.

No tear drops from Jewish Schumer for Israel passport holders who are banned from 16 Muslim countries.

Image may contain: 1 person, meme and text


FLASHBACK: Democrats Tried To Block Thousands Of Vietnam War Refugees, Including Orphans
http://dailycaller.com/2017/01/29/flashback-when-liberal-democrats-opposed-refugees-and-even-orphans/#ixzz4XMJxFm4l




Vietnamese refugees rest in a shed while awaiting transportation at the Libyan and Tunisian border crossing of Ras Jdir after fleeing unrest in Libya February 27, 2011. People in Tunisia and Egypt are driving to the border to help those arriving from Libya, with many hosting strangers in their homes, international aid groups said on Friday. More than 30,000 people have streamed across land borders in response to violence in Libya, mainly Tunisians and Egyptians who had been working in the North African country, according to the International Organisation for Migration. REUTERS/Zohra Bensemra
 
Daily Caller News Foundation

FLASHBACK: Democrats Tried To Block Thousands Of Vietnam War Refugees, Including Orphans

9:21 PM 01/29/2017
20637
2025
 
 
5449880
 
Despite today’s outrage over President Donald Trump’s refugee executive order, many liberals in 1975 were part of a chorus of big name Democrats who refused to accept any Vietnamese refugees when millions were trying to escape South Vietnam as it fell to the communists.
They even opposed orphans.
The group, led by California’s Gov. Jerry Brown, included such liberal luminaries asDelaware’s Democratic Sen. Joe Biden, former presidential “peace candidate” George McGovern, and New York Congresswoman Elizabeth Holtzman.
 
The Los Angeles Times reported Brown even attempted to prevent planes carrying Vietnamese refugees from landing at Travis Air Force Base outside San Francisco. About 500 people were arriving each day and eventually 131,000 arrived in the United States between 1975 and 1977.
 
These people arrived despite protests from liberal Democrats. In 2015, the Los Angeles Times recounted Brown’s ugly attitude, reporting, “Brown has his own checkered history of demagoguery about refugees.”
Back in 1975, millions of South Vietnamese who worked for or supported the U.S. found themselves trapped behind the lines when the communists took over the country. Vietnamese emigre Tung Vu, writing in Northwest Asian Weekly, recalled the hardships the Vietnamese faced in 1975 as they tried to escape the communists.
After the fall of Saigon, many Vietnamese chose to leave by any means possible, often in small boats. Those who managed to escape pirates, typhoons, and starvation sought safety and a new life in refugee camps,” Tung wrote.
Ironically, Republicans led by former President Gerald Ford were the political figures who fought for the refugees to enter the United States.
Julia Taft, who in 1975 headed up Ford’s Inter-agency Task Force on Indochinese refugee resettlement, told author Larry Engelmann in his book, “Tears Before the Rain: An Oral History of the Fall of South Vietnam,” “The new governor of California, Jerry Brown, was very concerned about refugees settling in his state.”
National Public Radio host Debbie Elliott retraced Brown’s refusal to accept any refugees in a January 2007 interview with Taft. According to a transcript, which was aired on its flagship program, “All Things Considered,” Taft said, “our biggest problem came from California due to Brown.” She called his rejection of Vietnamese refugees “a moral blow.”
“I remember at the time we had thousands and thousands of requests from military families in San Diego, for instance, who had worked in Vietnam, who knew some of these people,” she told NPR.
Taft recalled another dark reason the liberals opposed the refugees: “They said they had too many Hispanics, too many people on welfare, they didn’t want these people.”
“They didn’t want any of these refugees, because they had also unemployment,” she told NPR. “They had already a large number of foreign-born people there. They had – they said they had too many Hispanics, too many people on welfare, they didn’t want these people.”
Brown echoed his isolationist theme throughout his first term. As recounted by author Larry Clinton Thompson in his book, “Refugee Workers in the Indochina Exodus,” Brown said, “We can’t be looking 5,000 miles away and at the same time neglecting people who live here.”
At the same time as Brown was fighting Washington, Democrats waged an anti-refugee campaign inside the nation’s capital.
Ford appealed to Congress to quickly help the refugees, who included thousands of Cambodians fleeing a genocidal campaign perpetrated by the communist Cambodian Pol Pot regime.
But in Washington, Ford found himself thwarted by many high-profile Democrats.
A review of the congressional debate at the time and recounted by CQ Almanac shows New York’s Elizabeth Holtzman – who was one of the House’s most visible liberal congresswomen — opposed helping the refugees. Like Brown, she tried to pit her constituents against the refugees. She said, according to CQ Almanac, “some of her constituents felt that the same assistance and compassion was not being shown to the elderly, unemployed and poor in this country.”
Rep. Donald Riegle, a liberal representative from Michigan who later would serve as its senator, offered an amendment that would have barred funds for the refugees unless similar assistance was given to Americans. The amendment was rejected by the House, 346 to 71, according to the Almanac.
Another House Democrat even tried to slow down the airlift of Vietnamese orphans. The Almanac reported that Rep. Joshua Eilberg, the Democratic chairman of the House Subcommittee on Immigration, Citizenship and International Law, accused the Ford administration of having acted “with unnecessary haste” in the evacuation of the orphans.
The emergency rescue mission, called “Operation Babylift,” was activated by the United States, Australia, France and Canada after urgent appeals were issued by humanitarian relief organizations in Vietnam. The evacuation faced tragedy on its maiden flight when a C-5A cargo plane carrying the orphans crashed after takeoff, killing 78 children along with 35 U.S. government workers and diplomats.
The Library of Congress also reported liberal congressmen tried to stall the refugee legislation, indicating “they would rather wait for the administration to formulate a plan for the care and evacuation of refugees before approving the humanitarian aid.”
Then-Sen. Joe Biden tried to slow down the refugee bill in the Senate, complaining that he needed more details about the quickly unfolding refugee problem before he would support it. He said the White House “had not informed Congress adequately about the number of refugees,” according to the Library of Congress history of the legislation.
Quang X. Pham, who was born in Saigon and later served as a Marine pilot in the Persian Gulf War, later criticized Biden in an op-ed published by the Washington Post on December 30, 2006. Quang wrote, Biden “charged that the [Ford] Administration had not informed Congress adequately about the number of refugees — as if anyone actually knew during the chaotic evacuation.”
Peace candidate Sen. George McGovern, who had lost in a landslide to former President Richard Nixon in the 1972 presidential election, appeared the most heartless senator when he introduced a bill to assist those who wished to return to South Vietnam.
 
McGovern said he thought 90 percent of the Vietnamese arrivals “would be better off going back to their own land,” according to the Library of Congress. His amendment died in a House-Senate conference.
In the end, most of the Democrat complaints appeared to center on the fact that the refugees were escaping communism, which many liberals did not find that objectionable.
“One of the justifications that Ford gave was related to communism. He said these people are all fleeing communism, which was the same criteria that had been used for the Cubans, the Hungarians, other refugee groups that had been processed in the past,” Taft explained
 
Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.
 


Read more: 
http://dailycaller.com/2017/01/29/flashback-when-liberal-democrats-opposed-refugees-and-even-orphans/#ixzz4XMxvgpUW
 
 
****************************
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Voice VietnameseAmericans <voicevietnameseamericans26@gmail.com>
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
Sent: Mon, Jan 30, 2017 6:03 pm
Subject: Voice of Vietnamese Americans Stands with Refugees and Muslim Immigrants in Protecting the American Values

“President Trump's Executive Order on 01/27/2017 that effectively bars refugees and Muslims from entering the United States is against the American Values, the US Constitution and helps ISIS to spread.” Genie Giao Nguyen, President, Voice of Vietnamese Americans
 

Voice of Vietnamese Americans Stands with Refugees and Muslim Immigrants in Protecting the American Values
“President Trump's Executive Order on 01/27/2017 that effectively bars refugees and Muslims from entering the United States is against the American Values, the U.S. Constitution, and helps ISIS to spread.” Genie Giao Nguyen, President, Voice of Vietnamese Americans
Virginia, January 30, 2017 - Voice of Vietnamese Americans was very distressed and deeply troubled by President Trump's Executive Order issued on January 27, 2017, whereas the President "suspends the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP) for 120 days". The President finds that "entry of nationals of Syria as refugees is detrimental to the interests of the United States and thus suspends any such entry indefinitely". These actions and findings were baseless, inhumane, and against the core principle that we are a nation of refugees and immigrants since 1776 .
President Trump also stated that: "the entry of more than 50,000 refugees in fiscal year 2017 would be detrimental to the interests of the United States". This hardly was the case in our history. In 2015, the United States resettled 69,933 refugees. In 2016, the US admitted up to 85,000 refugees. Almost the same number of Christian (37,521) as Muslim refugees were admitted in fiscal 2016, which ended Sept. 30.
This Ban on Refugees is against our American humanitarian values, for hundreds of years raised high by the Statue of Liberty's invite to the world:
“Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free”
The executive order also prevents entry of individuals from Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen for 90 days, citing fear of terrorism.
According to Alex Nowrasteh of the CATO Institute, a conservative think tank, the number of Americans killed by citizens of the seven countries banned, from 1975 to 2015 are as follows: Iraq - zero, Iran -zero, Syria - zero, Yemen - zero, Libya - zero, Somalia - zero, Sudan - zero.
Senator Schumer of the Democratic Party has presented to the nation the painful real stories of refugees and immigrants being detained at the airport due to the executive order, with caution that : "This is one of the most backward and nasty executive orders that the president has issued." Senator Schumer made it clear: "Taking in immigrants and refugees is not only humanitarian but has also boosted our economy and created jobs decade after decade."
Respectable Leaders from the Republican Party such as Senator McCain and Senator Graham have clearly pointed out that such discriminating actions only turned out to be "self-inflicted wound" in our fight against terrorism.
Judges, Legislators from both parties, Governors and Attorneys General from many states all over the country have raised concerns about this ban on refugees and Muslim Immigrants.
Leaders from all over the world, including those from Australia, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Indonesia, Italy, Sweden, and the United Kingdom, as well as the nations that comprise the Arab League, have all spoken out in condemnation of the order. This would directly affect the global leadership in humanitarian values that the United States has achieved since World War II .
Standing in solidarity with Leaders of all Ethnic Communities, Voice of Vietnamese Americans solemnly urges the United States 45th President to uphold our American Values: that of Liberty and Justice for all.
We urge Mr. Trump to continue raising the Torch of Freedom, to uphold the Constitution, and to embrace all immigrants and refugees who are risking their lives for Freedom and American Values.
Withdraw the BANS on REFUGEES and Muslim IMMIGRANTS, Mr. President.

https://www.youtube.com/watch? v=gN50OdYbVgs
Everything4U số #704 Tin Mới Nhất Thời Sự Thế Giới Việt Nam 24h - Dân Mỹ TRỐ MẮT nhìn Donald Trump HÀNH ĐỘNG ngay ngày đầu Tổng ...

Sau khi theo dõi hết câu chuyện hội luận trên chương trình Little Saigon TV qua sự trình bày của hai ông Lê Minh Nguyên và TS Đinh Xuân Quân (TS là Trung Sĩ hay Tiến Sĩ thì không rõ) riêng tôi thấy hai ông này có vấn đề thần kinh hay trình độ cỡ trung sĩ là nhiều. Hai ông này không có vẻ gì là người có học vấn cao hay hiểu biết chính trường Mỹ nhiều. Tôi xin đơn cử những khuyết điểm nặng nề sau đây:

1.-Các giáo sư chính trị Mỹ trên CNN, Fox, MSNBC, LA Times, San Jose Mercury News, San Francisco Chronicle...không ai hay báo nào dám phê bình 1 vấn nạn chính trị nào bằng hai chữ "Ruồi Bu" rất là thấp kém về nghệ thuật truyền thông hay giáo dục khi các ông này mang title tiến sĩ. Các giáo sư Mỹ thường hay phân tích và phê phán là làm được hay không, lý do tại sao chứ không thấy ai chê người biểu tình hay chính phủ nhất là Tổng Thống Mỹ là "Ruồi Bu" nhiều lần như ô.  Quân này. Ông có tài cở nào thì thử ra ứng cử chức vụ nghị viên TP coi có thắng được không!! sức mấy mà làm nổi thế mà lại dám đem chuyện leaders với managers ra nói, thối hoắc!

TS Quân còn dám nói thủ tướng chỉ là manager mà thôi không phải leaders. Ngay cả thủ tướng Anh mà ông còn cho TT Anh là chỉ là manager, lấm-vá chổ này chổ kia, vậy thì leader của Anh là ai? Nữ Hoàng à? Tầm bậy Thủ Tướng Anh là 1 thể chế dùng chữ khác với Mỹ nhưng TT Anh tương đương với TT Mỹ. TT Anh và TT Mỹ đều là leaders cả không ai là manager hết.

Kế đến, khi nói về quốc hội thì các ông phải biết Quốc Hội Mỹ chỉ có quyền làm dự luật mà thôi. Bản thân các dự luật đó không có giá trị là luật và không ai tuân theo cho đến khi nó được TT vui vẻ ký thì nó mới thành luật. Ngân sách mà quốc hội đưa lên không làm cho TT hài lòng và TT không ký thì QH cũng ói máu không có tiền xài vì những ngân sách đó có rất nhiều quyền lợi cho các chính đảng. Cho nên cả hai phía QH và TT đều có quyền hành bằng nhau tuy nhiên TT vẫn có nhiều quyền hành hơn QH và cả hai hành pháp và lập pháp phải nhường nhau, mày làm TT thì ăn miếng lớn, tao QH ăn miếng nhỏ. Cả hai hòa dịu, uyển chuyển nương tựa nhau, chứ QH làm sao hơn TT được.

Thí dụ: Chỉ đơn cử 2 chuyện Obama đã làm: 
1.-Obama trả tiền mặt cho Iran đâu cần qua QH. 
2.-Obama và Clinton còn cung cấp vũ khí nuôi ISIS, Al Qaeda mà đâu cần qua QH. 

Trong khi đó phe CH tại sao không trả thù Obama đem Obama ra tòa hay luận tội Obama. Bằng chứng là chính nữ dân cử Dân Chủ là bà Tulsi Gabbard tố cáo Obama làm loạn, yểm trợ cho khủng bố Hồi Giáo (America financingTerrorists in Syria: Congress Woman Tulsi Gabbard On CNN).

Các ông còn dám nói là Executive Order của Tổng Thống không có giá trị thì hóa ra ô. Téo sĩ này lại chửi cha cái kiến thức ngơ ngác của ông ta. Các Ông nghỉ sao khi cả triệu người trên thế giới và tại Mỹ liên tục biểu tìn chống mấy cái Executive Orders (EO)? tại sao các cơ quan khác của chính phủ lại thi hành nếu nó không phải là luật và nó lại là chuyện "Ruồi Bu"? đã là chuyện Ruồi Bu thì tại sao họ lại đưa Hành Pháp và Ô. Trump ra tòa? Tối cao Pháp Viện nào mà đi xử chuyện Ruồi Bu? Chỉ có các ông là đem cái kiến thức hổ lốn của mình ra nói cho sướng mồm.

Một chứng minh khác là hàng trăm người vì cái sắc lệnh của TT mà phải bị bắt tại phi trường và chính phủ Canada nhân cơ hội này nhận hết những ai bị TT TTrump không  cho vô Mỹ. Như vậy thì các sắc lệnh đó có ruồi bu không?

Thêm nửa hãy coi Sở Di Trú, DHS thi hành lệnh của TT Trump như thế nào:

Department of Homeland Security Statement On Compliance With Court Orders And The President’s Executive Order
Release Date: January 29, 2017
For Immediate Release
Office of the Press Secretary
Contact: 202-282-8010
WASHINGTON - Upon issuance of the court orders yesterday, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) immediately began taking steps to comply with the orders. Concurrently, the Department of Homeland Security continues to work with our partners in the Departments of Justice and State to implement President Trump’s executive order on protecting the nation from foreign terrorist entry into the United States.
We are committed to ensuring that all individuals affected by the executive orders, including those affected by the court orders, are being provided all rights afforded under the law We are also working closely with airline partners to prevent travelers who would not be granted entry under the executive orders from boarding international flights to the U.S. Therefore, we do not anticipate that further individuals traveling by air to the United States will be affected.
As Secretary Kelly previously stated, in applying the provisions of the president's executive order, the entry of lawful permanent residents is in the national interest. Accordingly, absent significant derogatory information indicating a serious threat to public safety and welfare, lawful permanent resident status will be a dispositive factor in our case-by-case determinations.
We are and will remain in compliance with judicial orders. We are and will continue to enforce President Trump’s executive order humanely and with professionalism. DHS will continue to protect the homeland.

Đây là những bằng chứng cho thấy người Việt chúng ta dù bằng cấp cao thế nào đi nửa thì cũng thiếu rất nhiều kiến thức thực dụng, những ai là học trò hai ông này thì cả đời chả làm được gì. TT Mỹ mà các ôngcòn cho là không có tầm nhìn thì chán các ông quá, chỉ có các ông là cái rốn của vũ trụ thôi. TT Mỹ như Ô. Trump là vứt đi phải không mấy ông téo-sĩ? Cả mấy anh con trời tỉ phú Mễ, TT Mễ, Trung Cộng, Đài Loan, Bắc Hàn, Nam Hàn và Vịt cộng mà còn sợ Trump tím mặt trong khi các anh dám bảo TT Trump làm chuyện "Ruồi Bu", kỳ thị, vi hiến...thì chịu thua các ông luôn!

Các ông có hiểu rõ hiến pháp Mỹ chỉ áp dụng cho người Mỹ mà thôi, nó không áp dụng cho người nào chưa là công dân Mỹ dù họ là Immigrant chứ nói chi đến chuyện chưa đặt chân đến đất Mỹ hay là nhập cảnh lậu. Xin các ông hiểu cho rõ Ô. Trump mới làm việc có 1 tuần nên làm sao chúng ta có thể chê bai 1 người đã thắng mọi khó khăn để lên làm TT Mỹ? Thứ hai nửa Hiến Pháp Mỹ chỉ áp dụng công bằng cho mọi người Mỹ mà thôi. Không có hiến pháp nước nào áp dụng đồng đều cho cả người dân chính gốc và người di dân lậu hết. Các ông thử chứng minh coi nước nào làm như các ông nói không? Thế giới đại đồng à???

Khi ra tòa thì Ô. Trump sẽ thắng lớn vì ông ta không có kỳ thị người Mỹ hay người di dân lậu nào cả mà TT chỉ không cho những người nào không phải người Mỹ được vào Mỹ mà thôi. Không có quốc tịch Mỹ thì không được vào Mỹ như vậy thì kỳ thị cái con khỉ gì? Trời ơi tiến sĩ hay trung sĩ vậy? Những người bình dân, it học ở Mỹ và người dân không phải Mỹ, không biết tiếng Mỹ, không biết gì nhiều về Mỹ mà người ta sợ Executive Order của Ô. Trump như vậy. Hóa ra người bình dân ít học, họ hiểu nhiều hơn các ông nhiều lắm. Xin các ông cho biết quyền hạn của 1 tổng thống Mỹ có được cấm người không có quốc tịch Mỹ vào Mỹ được hay không? "We are also working closely with airline partners to prevent travelers who would not be granted entry under the executive orders from boarding international flights to the U.S" Xin các ông trả lời thử coi EO này của Ô. Trump tại sao được các hãng máy bay thi hành? Xin trả lời thử coi cái EO cấm vào Mỹ của Ô. Trump có kỳ thị hay là không Yes hay No trả lời thử coi! Tôi bảo đãm QH Mỹ sẽ chỉ tranh cãi tí xíu cho vui, lâu lâu đem ra hâm nóng để mọi người nhớ mà đừng lo vào Mỹ nửa. Cả Tối Cao Pháp Viện cũng sẽ tuyên bố Ô. Trump làm việc hợp hiến nhưng xin áp dụng trong vài năm thôi.

TT Mễ, tỷ phú Mễ phải cạy cục xin gặp Ô. Trump để xin xỏ mà các ông cho là TT Trump làm chuyện ruồi bu thì các ông quả là "trứng khôn hơn rận"!

Thôi bàn tán về mấy cái xoong-chảo nghe chán quá chẳng học hỏi được gì hay cả. Thôi không bàn tới mấy ông xì-dầu này làm gì cho mệt! các hảng hàng không thế giới phải hoàn trả tiền vé cho những người không được Ô. Trump cho vào Mỹ bắt đầu từ ngày 30/1/2017 rồi đó mấy ông nội ơi! Mấy ông nói ít lại và để cho bọn trẻ tập nói thì hay hơn.

Thomas Nguyễn

Tài liệu tìm hiểu thêm:

Trump and Mexico's richest man meet for 'lovely dinner' at Mar-a-Lago resort

The two billionaires, who have clashed in the past, appeared to set aside their differences – although the contents of their discussion were not disclosed
Billionaire Carlos Slim has previously attacked Trump’s talk of ripping up Nafta and scrapped a TV deal with him on the ground that he was a racist.
Billionaire Carlos Slim has previously attacked Donald Trump’s talk of ripping up Nafta and scrapped a TV deal with him on the grounds that he was a racist. Photograph: Carlos Jasso/Reuters 
Donald Trump once described Mexico’s wealthiest man as the string-pulling manipulator who orchestrated a media conspiracy to defeat his election campaign.
Carlos Slim has previously scrapped a TV deal with Trump on the grounds that he was a racist.
But the two billionaires appear to have set aside those differences, for now at least, sitting down to a meal at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida on Saturday.
Contents of the dinner or discussion were not disclosed, though Trump called the encounter “a lovely dinner with a wonderful man” in a statement to the Washington Post, which broke news of the meeting.
The president-elect’s statement sounded a softer note on the subject of Slim, who Trump attacked over his ownership stake in the New York Times and friendship with Bill Clinton, whose foundation Slim has donated to over the years.
“The New York Times strings are being pulled by Mexico’s Carlos Slim, a billionaire who benefits from Nafta and supports Hillary Clinton’s open border policies,” Trump alleged in an 23 October campaign statement.
Slim, the son of Lebanese immigrants, made his early money by investing in Mexico at a time others were abandoning the country. His net worth dwarfs that of the property developer-turned-president elect.
He won control of the Telmex monopoly in the early 1990s and turned it into what was for a time the world’s largest private fortune. Slim has attacked Trump’s talk of ripping up Nafta, which threatens to undo two decades of increased economic integration with the United States.
The Washington Post reported Trump’s ex-campaign manager Cory Lewandowski travelled to Mexico City to arranged the meeting, which was to touch on topics such as trade and the economy.

News of the encounter came as a surprise, as Trump had described Mexicans as “rapists” and promised to build a border wall and deport millions of migrants. He also appears to have had an unhappy history in his attempts at doing business south of the border.

“He doesn’t seem to have any good Mexican buddies,” said Federico Estévez, political science professor at the Autonomous Technological Institute of Mexico. “The only Mexicans he knows he hates – like Slim.”
Slim has not spoken on the Trump meeting, but had softened his tone since the election, telling a business forum, “If the United States grows 4%, increases infrastructure and lowers taxes, that is good.”
Other suspected self-interest from a man whose business empire is so expansive in Mexico, it’s joked that Mexicans can’t help but put money in Slim’s wallet as they go about their daily lives.
“As patriotic as Slim may be, he’s interested foremost in his business. So he could be meeting Trump to ensure that nothing happens to all his dealings in the US,” said Esteban Illades, editor of the Mexican magazine Nexos.
“Slim probably noticed that the Mexican government isn’t doing enough, so he’s taking diplomacy into his own hands.”
The Mexican peso has plummeted since Trump announced his presidential aspirations and forecasts have slashed 2017 growth projections. The federal government and central bank, meanwhile, say they have plans to confront Trump, though few proposals have been announced. Many Mexicans seem to be betting that Trump will soften his positions before taking office.
“They’re still expecting him to smooth over the message … once he has to govern, he will act and think differently from when he was campaigning,” Estévez said.
“They firmly believe that piece of establishment nonsense, even though he has shown no evidence of it thus far.”
Past attempts at talking with Trump have proved problematic for Mexico’s president, Enrique Peña Nieto.
Peña Nieto invited Trump to the presidential palace in Mexico City in late August – an ill-fated meeting in which Mexicans complained their leader acted passively in the presence of a person they considered a bully and the biggest threat to the country since the authors of the Mexican-American war of the 1840s.
“The [Peña Nieto] government has not known how to deal with Trump from the start,” said Javier Garza, a journalist and political analyst in the city of Torreón. “It’s not clear that Trump will soften his message on Mexico. What is clear is that Trump seems inclined to use businessmen instead of politicians or diplomats as his channels with Mexico.”
 

No comments:

Post a Comment